Kymab wins UK court case against Regeneron’s patent claims
Kymab has announced that the Supreme Court of the UK has held that
all of the claims of two patents owned by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals that
were asserted against Kymab are invalid. The patents in question are
EP(UK) 1 360 287 and EP(UK) 2 264 163, otherwise known as the ‘Murphy
patents’.
The Murphy patents sought to cover genetically modified
mice containing chimeric human-mouse antibody genes and the human
antibodies made using such mice. The European Patent Office (EPO) had
previously upheld them but had not considered evidence that was
available to the UK courts.
The UK court’s decision upholds the
February 2016 decision of the High Court trial judge, Mr Justice Henry
Carr to revoke the claims and reverses the Appeal Court’s determination
that they were valid.
A five-member panel of the Supreme Court
heard arguments on the 11 and 12 of February 2020. It was held that the
relevant claims of the Murphy patents were invalid for insufficiency
because they did not enable the ordinary skilled person to work the
claimed invention across the breadth of the claims, in line with
established jurisprudence of the UK courts and EPO. The Supreme Court
noted that Kymab’s ability to create transgenic mice with the entire
human antibody variable region depended upon Kymab’s own inventions made
separately after the priority date of the Murphy patents.
“We
are grateful that the court has recognised the shortcomings of the
Regeneron patents and reinforced the established law that requires that
an invention is adequately enabled across its scope,” said Simon Sturge,
Chief Executive Officer of Kymab. “Kymab’s IntelliSelect® platforms
continue to generate best‑in‑class, fully human monoclonal antibodies,
underpinned by our extensive IP estate.”
Counterparts of the
Murphy patents have also been litigated by third parties in the US where
an equivalent one was found to be invalid.
The US Patent
Office’s Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) rejected five petitions
filed by Regeneron leaving each patent and their claims in full force in
the US. Kymab’s Japanese and Australian patents have also been upheld.